Compare · Creative OS

Creative OS alternative: pricing, review and coverage

Creative OS (creativeos.com) is a creative production platform: more than 20,000 performance ad templates for Meta, TikTok, email and landing pages, an editor that opens them in Canva or Figma, and an AI Lab that writes copy and scores the creative you upload. Self-serve plans run $29, $59 and $119 a month.

It does a real job. It is just not the job most people are doing when they go looking for a Creative OS alternative. A template shows you what a good ad looks like in the abstract and tells you nothing about what is working in your category this month. You still have to guess which angle goes in it.

AdEye answers the other half, for one platform. It reads the Google Ads Transparency Center and turns a competitor name or domain into a live feed of the ads that brand is running through Google right now, ranked by how long each has been running, with AI hook, angle and format tags on paid plans. Plans are $39, $99 and $299 a month, or $32, $79 and $239 billed yearly.

The honest limits before you switch: AdEye has no templates, no design editor and no Canva or Figma integration, and it covers Google only, not Meta or TikTok.

Ad Intelligence Feed

Live Google data

Enter a brand or a domain

Searching the Google Ads Transparency Center...

Try:

Public Google Ads Transparency data. Nothing behind a login.

Open your swipe file

Google Ads Transparency has no ads on record for that search. Google indexes ads by advertiser, so the brand's exact domain works best — for example nike.com.

Google Ads Transparency has no ads on record for . That is an answer about the brand, not a problem with the search: they are not running Google ads that Google publishes, or they advertise under a different registered name.

We could not reach Google Ads Transparency just now, so this is not a result about that brand, we simply could not look. Please try again in a moment. This search has not been counted against your allowance.

Open your swipe file

free left ·

See the comparison

Live Google Ads Transparency data · Run length · Public data only

Creative OS is a creative production platform: 20,000+ editable ad, email and landing page templates plus an AI Lab that writes and scores creative, from $29 to $119 a month. It does not show you what competitors are advertising. AdEye is the Creative OS alternative for teams who want the live competitor ads first: a Google Ads Transparency feed ranked by run length, from $32 a month billed yearly.

Side by side

AdEye vs Creative OS, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters	AdEye	Creative OS
Live competitor ads from a public ad library	Yes, from the Google Ads Transparency Center	No, the library is templates, not live ads
Editable ad templates	No, AdEye does not sell templates	Yes, 20,000+ and this is the core product
Canva and Figma editing	No	Yes, plus their own editor
Google Ads coverage	Yes, on every plan, this is the whole feed	No, templates are Meta, TikTok, email and landing pages
Meta and TikTok coverage	No, AdEye reads the Google library only	Yes, as template formats
Email and landing page assets	No, ad research only	Yes, templates for both
Run length on each ad	Yes, this is the ranking signal	No, there is nothing live to measure
AI creative scoring of your own ads	No, AdEye tags competitor creative, it does not grade yours	Yes, Creative Analyzer scores across seven dimensions
AI hook, angle and format tags on competitor ads	Yes, on paid plans	No
Published entry price	$39/mo, or $32/mo billed yearly	$29/mo Spark
Best suited for	Teams deciding what to say before they design it	Teams who know the angle and need it designed fast

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest. Creative OS is a trademark of its owner, used here for fair comparison.

Why marketers pick AdEye

The ad spy tool that shows you the why

What Creative OS costs in 2026

Creative OS publishes three self-serve tiers. Spark is $29 a month and gives you one seat, 50 AI credits and access to the 20,000+ template library. Ignite is $59 a month for one seat, 100 credits and unlimited template use. Pro is $119 a month, the tier they mark most popular, for three seats, 200 credits and the full AI Lab including Concept Studio and Creative Analyzer. Above that sits a $5,000 a month managed service where their team runs your Meta campaigns, which is a different purchase entirely. Annual billing is discounted around 50 percent, and the self-serve plans other than Spark carry a three day free trial. Credits matter more than the seat count on these plans, because the AI tools consume them and heavy concepting burns through 50 quickly. Verify the current numbers on their pricing page before you commit, since creative tooling prices move often.

Templates answer execution, not what to say

The reason people search for a Creative OS alternative is rarely the price. It is that a template library solves the wrong bottleneck. A well built template makes a static ad look professional in ten minutes, which is genuinely useful when you already know the hook, the offer and the proof point you want to lead with. It does nothing when you are staring at a blank brief for a category you just picked up. Twenty thousand templates all look plausible, and choosing between them is a design decision dressed up as a strategy decision. The input that unblocks that brief is evidence: which claims your competitors keep funding, which formats they have moved to this quarter, and which hooks they have quietly dropped. That evidence only exists in the live ad transparency records, which is what AdEye reads for Google.

Where Creative OS genuinely wins

It would be dishonest to run this comparison one way. Creative OS does several things AdEye does not do at all, and will not. It gives you editable design files, opened in Canva or Figma, which is a production capability AdEye has none of. It covers email and landing page templates as well as ads, so it reaches further down the funnel than an ad research tool does. Its AI Lab grades creative you upload, checks ad to landing page continuity and remixes images for different audiences, none of which AdEye offers because AdEye analyses competitor ads rather than yours. If your team has a clear creative direction and is bottlenecked purely on design throughput, Creative OS is aimed squarely at that and AdEye is not a substitute for it.

The pairing most teams actually want

These two tools sit at opposite ends of the same workflow, so the sharpest setup is usually both, not either. Research first: pull the live Google creative from the six or eight brands you compete with through AdEye, sort by run length so the funded ads rise above the tests, and read the hook and angle tags to see which promise the category is converging on. That gives you a brief with evidence behind it. Then produce: take the angle into Creative OS, pick a template that fits the format, and ship it. What you avoid is the common failure where a team buys a template library, produces twenty polished ads a week, and none of them land because every one was built on a guess about what the market wanted to hear.

What AdEye covers, and what it does not

AdEye reads one source: the Google Ads Transparency Center, which is Google's own public record of the ads an advertiser is running through it. You search by brand name or by domain, because that is how Google indexes ads, by advertiser rather than by topic, and you get that advertiser's live creative in one feed with run length on every ad. AI hook, angle and format tags come with the paid plans, and swipe file boards let you keep the ones worth studying. The limits are worth stating plainly: no Meta, no TikTok, no Pinterest, no LinkedIn, no native or push networks, no product or store sales data, no dollar spend estimates, and no searching by niche or keyword. Everything comes from public transparency records, so nothing here is scraped from behind a login.

Good questions

Creative OS vs AdEye, answered

Creative OS publishes three self-serve monthly plans: Spark at $29, Ignite at $59 and Pro at $119. Spark includes one seat and 50 AI credits, Ignite adds unlimited template use, and Pro gives three seats, 200 credits and the full AI Lab. A managed service that runs your Meta campaigns is listed at $5,000 a month. Annual billing is discounted roughly 50 percent.

Creative OS offers a three day free trial on its self-serve plans other than Spark. Three days is short for evaluating a template library properly, so go in with one specific campaign you need to build rather than browsing. Check the current terms on their pricing page, because trial length is the detail creative tools change most often.

It depends which half of the product you rely on. If you need editable design files, look at Canva Pro or a Figma template pack, because that is a production problem. If what you actually needed was to know which ads are working before you design anything, AdEye reads the Google Ads Transparency Center from $32 a month billed yearly and shows the live creative rather than a template of it.

No. Creative OS is a template and AI production platform, so its library is made up of designed templates rather than ads currently running in the market. Its Template Match feature can find a template resembling an ad you upload, but you have to source that ad somewhere else first. Live competitor creative comes from the public ad transparency records, and AdEye reads the Google one.

No, and it is worth being clear about that before you switch. AdEye has no template library, no design editor and no Canva or Figma integration. It shows you a competitor's live Google ads, tags them by hook, angle and format on paid plans, and lets you save them to a swipe file your team can work from. Turning that into a finished ad still happens in your design tool.

Buy the research first if you are unsure what to say, and the templates first if you already know. A team entering a new category or picking up an unfamiliar client gets more out of seeing what the category is already funding. A team with a proven angle and a backlog of concepts gets more out of faster production. At $29 and $39 entry prices respectively, plenty of teams run both.

No. Its templates cover Meta, TikTok, email and landing pages. Google Search, Display and Performance Max are not template formats it is built around. AdEye covers exactly that gap: the Google Ads Transparency Center is its only source, so if your competitors buy through Google you can see what they are running. Meta and TikTok are the reverse gap, and AdEye does not cover them.

Creative OS advertises more than 20,000 templates spanning ads, emails and landing pages, organised by vertical including fashion, beauty, SaaS and fitness, with new designs added on weekdays. Volume is the selling point. Whether volume helps depends on whether your bottleneck is production speed or knowing which angle deserves production at all.

It is a set of AI tools around the template library: Customer Voice pulls hooks out of your reviews, Copy Lab generates headline variations, Concept Studio proposes creative concepts, Creative Analyzer scores an ad you upload across seven dimensions, Funnel Check compares your ad against its landing page, and Template Match finds templates resembling an ad you supply. They consume the monthly credits on your plan.

No, and no honest tool can for ordinary US commercial advertising. Google publishes spend figures only for political and social-issue ads. AdEye reports what is verifiable instead: how long each creative has been running. A creative in its ninth week is being funded. One that ran four days was a failed test.

No. AdEye is a web app you log into, with nothing to install and no browser permissions to grant. Everything runs server side against the Google Ads Transparency Center, so the results are the same on any machine your team uses and there are no page-scraping permissions to grant.

Yes. Everything AdEye indexes comes from the Google Ads Transparency Center, the official public record Google publishes of the ads it serves. Nothing sits behind a login and no private account data is touched. That library exists so that ads running to the public can be inspected by the public.

Most teams are working the same day. Sign up, enter the competitor brand names or domains you already track, and AdEye pulls their live public Google ads into one feed. There is no demo call, no annual commitment and no onboarding period. The slowest part is deciding which creatives are worth saving into a swipe file.

More comparisons