Compare · SpyFu

SpyFu alternative: SpyFu competitors for Google ads

SpyFu and AdEye both stop at the edge of Google, and that is where the similarity ends. SpyFu is a keyword and bid intelligence product: it tells you which terms a competitor has bought, roughly what they spend, how their rankings moved, and what their ad copy said, going back well over a decade. AdEye is a creative product: it reads the Google Ads Transparency Center and hands you the actual ads a competitor is running right now, image, video and Search text, each stamped with how long Google has been showing it.

That difference decides which one you should buy. If your question is which keywords should I bid on and what will they cost me, SpyFu answers it and AdEye cannot, because AdEye holds no keyword or bid data at all. If your question is what creative is my competitor actually running, and which of it has survived long enough to be worth copying the structure of, AdEye answers it from Google's own published record and SpyFu does not, because SpyFu reports ad text and estimates rather than the live creative.

Prices checked at both sites today: SpyFu advertises from $29 a month. AdEye is $39, or $32 billed yearly.

Ad Intelligence Feed

Live Google data

Enter a brand or a domain

Searching the Google Ads Transparency Center...

Try:

Public Google Ads Transparency data. Nothing behind a login.

Open your swipe file

Google Ads Transparency has no ads on record for that search. Google indexes ads by advertiser, so the brand's exact domain works best — for example nike.com.

Google Ads Transparency has no ads on record for . That is an answer about the brand, not a problem with the search: they are not running Google ads that Google publishes, or they advertise under a different registered name.

We could not reach Google Ads Transparency just now, so this is not a result about that brand, we simply could not look. Please try again in a moment. This search has not been counted against your allowance.

Open your swipe file

free left ·

See the comparison

Live Google Ads Transparency data · Run length · Public data only

SpyFu is a Google-focused competitive intelligence suite covering PPC keywords, bid history, estimated spend, historical ad copy, organic rankings and backlinks, advertised from $29 a month. AdEye covers a narrower job on the same platform: the live creative in the Google Ads Transparency Center, ranked by how long each ad has been running, AI-tagged by hook and angle on paid plans, saved into swipe boards, from $32 a month billed yearly.

Side by side

AdEye vs SpyFu, honestly

A fair look at what each does well. Both are capable tools. Here is where they differ.

What matters	AdEye	SpyFu
Live Google ad creative (image, video, Search text)	Yes, straight from the Ads Transparency Center	Historical ad copy text, not the live creative
Keywords a competitor bids on	No, AdEye holds no keyword data	Yes, this is the core of the product
Estimated ad spend and clicks	No, and no public source publishes it	Yes, as a model rather than a measurement
How long each ad has been running	Yes, on every result, and it is the default sort	Ad history by date seen, not run length
Historical depth	No, live ads only	Yes, SpyFu advertises 18+ years
Organic keywords and backlinks	No, AdEye is not an SEO tool	Yes, included in the same subscription
Creative tagging by hook, angle and format	Yes, on the paid plans	No, SpyFu works from keywords and ad text
Swipe boards for saving competitor ads	Yes, on every plan	No, results are exported as data
Meta, TikTok or LinkedIn ads	No, Google only	No, Google only
Advertised entry price	$32 a month billed yearly, $39 month to month	From $29 a month

Comparison reflects general, publicly understood positioning. Capabilities change, so check each product for the latest. SpyFu is a trademark of its owner, used here for fair comparison.

Why marketers pick AdEye

The ad spy tool that shows you the why

What SpyFu costs in 2026

SpyFu advertises pricing from $29 a month and names three tiers: Basic, Professional and Team or Agency. The Professional tier is quoted at $119 a month after a discounted first month, and annual billing is advertised as saving $120, $360 and $744 a year across the three tiers respectively, with extra users at $30 each. One caution if you are comparing quotes: SpyFu loads its plan prices into the page with JavaScript, and several third-party review sites quote figures that no longer match what the site shows. Read the numbers on spyfu.com before you commit, and treat any price you find in a blog post, including this paragraph on a later date, as needing a check.

Estimates versus the published record

This is the real decision, and it is not about which tool is better. SpyFu builds its keyword volumes, bid values and spend figures by modelling: crawling SERPs at scale and inferring what an advertiser is probably paying. That is legitimate and often the only way to get an answer, but it is an estimate, and it carries error that nobody outside the ad account can quantify. AdEye reports only what Google itself publishes in the Ads Transparency Center: this verified advertiser, this creative, first shown on this date, still showing. There is no modelling layer, which is also why AdEye can tell you nothing about keywords or budget. Buy the estimate when you need a number to plan a budget. Buy the record when you need to know what is actually on screen.

Run length is the signal SpyFu does not sort by

A competitor launching an ad tells you they had a budget meeting. A competitor still running that same ad four months later tells you it survived contact with their numbers, because nobody keeps funding creative that loses. AdEye puts that date on every result and sorts by it, so a search returns a competitor's proven ads at the top and their failed tests underneath. SpyFu does track ad copy over time and will show you which text a competitor has run repeatedly, which is a related signal, but you are reading it out of a keyword timeline rather than sorting a creative feed by longevity.

Where SpyFu is plainly the better buy

If you are running Google Ads and your next decision is a bidding decision, SpyFu wins and it is not close. Which keywords is this competitor buying, which ones did they abandon, what is the rough cost per click in this category, how has their position moved over five years: AdEye answers none of that and never will, because the Ads Transparency Center does not publish keywords. SpyFu also folds in organic rankings and backlinks, so an in-house team that would otherwise buy a PPC tool and an SEO tool can get both. AdEye is worth its price only if the creative itself is what you are short of.

Running both, which is what most teams end up doing

These products overlap less than the category page suggests, so agencies frequently keep both and use them at different points. SpyFu sets the media plan: the terms worth bidding on, the competitors defending them, the rough cost of entry. AdEye sets the creative brief: the ads those same competitors are running against those terms right now, which hooks repeat, which formats they favour, and which creatives have been live long enough to have earned their place. At $32 and $29 a month respectively at entry level, running both costs less than most single seats in this category.

Good questions

SpyFu vs AdEye, answered

It depends which half of SpyFu you actually use. For competitor keywords, bid history and estimated spend, the closest rivals are Semrush and Ahrefs, both broader and more expensive. For seeing the live Google ad creative a competitor is running, with run length and a swipe file, AdEye covers that from $32 a month. No single tool replaces both sides of SpyFu cheaply.

SpyFu advertises pricing from $29 a month, across three tiers named Basic, Professional and Team or Agency. Its Professional tier is quoted at $119 a month after a discounted first month, annual billing is advertised as saving $120, $360 and $744 a year on the three tiers, and additional users are $30 each. Confirm on spyfu.com before buying, because the plan prices render dynamically and third-party figures go stale quickly.

SpyFu is accurate in the way a well-built model is accurate: directionally reliable, useful for ranking competitors and sizing a market, and wrong in the details. Keyword volumes, cost per click and monthly ad spend are all inferred from crawling, not reported by Google, so treat them as estimates. The one number nobody has to model is what Google publishes itself, which is the advertiser behind an ad and the dates it ran.

It shows ad copy, meaning the historical Search headlines and descriptions a competitor has run, which is genuinely useful for messaging. What it does not give you is a browsable feed of the live image, video and Shopping creative currently serving. That sits in the Google Ads Transparency Center, which is what AdEye reads and turns into a sortable feed.

No. AdEye has no keyword data, no bid data and no cost-per-click estimates, and this is the single biggest reason to choose SpyFu over it. Google does not publish the keywords behind an ad in the Ads Transparency Center, so AdEye has nothing to read. If keyword research is the job, buy SpyFu or Semrush.

The Google Ads Transparency Center itself is free and public, and it is the same source AdEye reads. If you only need to check one competitor occasionally, use it directly at adstransparency.google.com. Paid tools earn their price when you are tracking many advertisers weekly and need sorting, tagging, run length and somewhere to save what you find rather than a fresh manual search each time.

Semrush is the broader suite and the more expensive one, with PPC data sitting behind a separate advertising add-on. SpyFu is narrower, cheaper and more focused on paid-search history, which is why smaller PPC teams tend to prefer it. Neither gives you the live Google display and video creative, because both are keyword-led products rather than creative libraries.

Not as a fact. Google publishes spend figures only for political and social-issue advertising, so every dollar amount you see attached to an ordinary commercial advertiser is a model. SpyFu publishes such estimates and is transparent that they are estimates. AdEye publishes none, and instead reports how long each creative has run, which is verifiable in Google's own record.

No. SpyFu is a Google product covering paid search, Shopping and organic search. AdEye is also Google only. If Meta or TikTok creative research is what you need, neither tool covers it and you should look at a Meta-focused library instead.

If you manage Google Ads accounts and pitch on keyword opportunity, yes, because the competitor keyword and bid history shortens the audit work that wins the account. If your pitch is creative, meaning you win work by showing a prospect what their rivals are running and where the messaging gap is, the keyword data is not what you present, and a creative feed does more for less.

Yes, and that combination is common because the overlap is small. SpyFu tells you which terms to buy and roughly what they cost. AdEye tells you what the advertisers already buying those terms are showing people, and which of those ads have been running long enough to be worth learning from. Together they cover the media plan and the creative brief.

From the Google Ads Transparency Center, the public record Google publishes of the ads it serves and the verified advertisers behind them. AdEye queries it by brand or domain and returns the results as a sortable feed with the first-shown date on every creative. Nothing is scraped from behind a login, and there is no browser extension to install.

Almost always because they have not completed Google advertiser verification, and unverified advertisers do not appear in the Transparency Center at all. The second common reason is searching a brand name when the ads sit under a legal entity or an agency account. Search the domain instead, which resolves to every advertiser account pointing at that site.

You can run two searches without an account and ten a month on a free account, which is enough to check whether your competitors are verified advertisers with ads worth watching. Paid plans start at $39 a month, or $32 billed yearly, and raise that to 500 searches a month.

More comparisons